HOME  INTERVIEWS  RESOURCES  NEWS  ABOUT

View by:  Subject  Theme  Question  Term  Person  Event

In general, as pointed out above, those features and behaviors that are considered adaptations are explained teleologically. This is simply because adaptations are features that come about by natural selection.

Among alternative genetic variants that may arise by mutation or recombination, the ones that become established in a population are those that contribute more to the reproductive success of their carriers. "Fitness" is the measure used by evolutionists to quantify reproductive success. But reproductive success is usually mediated by some function or property. Wings and hands acquired their present configuration through long-term accumulation of genetic variants adaptive to their carriers. How natural selection yields adaptive features may be explained with examples where the adaptation arises as a consequence of a single gene mutation.

One example is the presence of normal hemoglobin rather than hemoglobin S in humans. One amino acid substitution in the beta chain in humans results in hemoglobin molecules less efficient for oxygen transport. The general occurrence in human populations of normal rather than S hemoglobin is explained teleologically by the contribution of hemoglobin to effective oxygen transport and thus to reproductive success.

A second example, the difference between peppered-gray moths and melanic moths is also due to one or only a few genes. The replacement of gray moths by melanics in polluted regions is explained teleologically by the fact that in such regions melanism decreases the probability that a moth be eaten by a bird. The predominance of peppered forms in nonpolluted regions is similarly explained.

Not all features of organisms need to be explained teleologically, since not all come about as a direct result of natural selection. Some features may become established by random genetic drift, by chance association with adaptive traits, or in general by processes other than natural selection. Proponents of the neutrality theory of protein evolution argue that many alternative protein variants are adaptively equivalent. Most evolutionists would admit that at least in certain cases the selective differences between alternative amino acids at a certain site in a protein must be virtually nil, particularly when population size is very small. The presence in a population of one amino acid sequence rather than another, adaptively equivalent to the first, would not then be explained teleologically. Needless to say, in such cases there would be amino acid sequences that would not be adaptive. The presence of an adaptive protein rather than a nonadaptive one would be explained teleologically; but the presence of one protein rather than another among those adaptively equivalent would not require a teleological explanation.

To return to the previous topic, click on your browser's 'Back' button.

Go to Evolution Topic Index

Teleology and Teleological Explanations

Evolution: Topic Index
The Darwinian Revolution
Darwin's Discovery: Design without Designer
Natural Selection as a Directive Process
Natural Selection as a Creative Process
Natural Selection as an Opportunistic Process
Chance and Necessity
The Compatiblity of Teological and Causal Explanations
Coda: Science as a Way of Knowing

Source:

Dr. Francisco Ayala
Dr. Francisco Ayala

Bibliography

See also:

Genetics
Evolution
The Relation of Science & Religion
Purpose and Design
The Argument From Design
The Anthropic Principle
Opinions
Charles Darwin
Galileo
Copernicus
Sir Isaac Newton
DNA Double-Helix