HOME  INTERVIEWS  RESOURCES  NEWS  ABOUT

View by:  Subject  Theme  Question  Term  Person  Event

In his posted reply to an earlier version of this essay (see note 44) Dembski clearly expressed his expectation that the flagellar portion of the E. coli genome is not the only portion that required non-natural configurational action. Considering the flagellar portion to be the only designer configured portion would be, in Dembski’s words, "a position that I don’t hold and for which I never argued."

To return to the previous topic, click on your browser's 'Back' button.

E. Coli at the No Free Lunchroom

Is the flagellum complex? Computing the crucial probability.

Introduction
The Core of Dembski’s Case for ID
Why focus on the bacterial flagellum?
Getting Acquainted With the ID Vocabulary
Doing what comes naturally
Darwinism = evolution + maximal naturalism
The Darwinian mechanism
What does it mean to be “intelligently designed”?
The signs of design
E. coli and its Rotary Propulsion System: Dembski’s Flagship Case for Design
Is the flagellum complex? General considerations
Is the flagellum specified?
Bacterial Flagella and Dembski’s Case for Intelligent Design: Closing Arguments

Source:

Howard Van Till
Dr. Howard Van Till

See also:

Dembski: Intelligent Design Coming Clean...
Origins
Genetics
Evolution
Philosophy
Purpose and Design
Opinions
Charles Darwin
Bacterial Flagellum
DNA Double-Helix
Books on Biology, Genetics and Theology