HOME

 

 

    NEWS

INTERVIEWS

RESOURCES

ABOUT

View by:

 SUBJECT

 THEME

QUESTION

  TERM

 PERSON

   EVENT

Genes and Sin

As scientists understand more about our genetic makeup, one thing they are beginning to explore is the possibility of links between genes and behavior. Already it has been reported, that there may be genetic predispositions for alcoholism, violence, and even sexual orientation. Some people believe that much of our personality and behavior is genetically determined. For Christians, the notion of genetic determinism raises serious theological questions, because if our behavior is largely determined by our genes then what becomes of the idea of free will - the notion that we have a choice about how we act? If we don't really have a choice, but are compelled to do things by our genetic makeup, then how can we be held morally accountable?

This question came to the fore in 1993 when Dean Hamer and his team at the National Cancer Institute announced they had found a genetic predisposition for homosexuality. The news was welcomed by many gay rights groups who felt that if homosexuality was written in their genes then it must be seen as natural, and not a moral choice. If it was part of their bodily makeup, so to speak, then in could not be a sin. Theologian Ted Peters, who has written extensively on this subject, has pointed out, however, that the theological argument is not so simple. From a theological standpoint, Peters says, we all have in-built tendencies towards sin - be it gluttony, anger, or whatever. But according to Christian tradition, our moral duty is to try to rise above these dispositions and to "transcend" our bodily "weaknesses". Looked at from this stand point, even if homosexuality is built-in that does not necessarily serve as a justification.

Peters' point is not to argue for or against homosexuality, but to highlight the dangers of simplistic deterministic thinking. Take the case of alcoholism, for example. If we come to think of alcoholism as genetically determined, then will we start denying people with the relevant genes the right to drink at all? Likewise, if we discover genes associated with violence, will we screen everyone at birth and lock up those who possess the genes? There are no easy answers here. The point is that scientific discoveries can often be interpreted in many different ways, and nowhere more so than with the science of genetics. For better or worse, genetics is challenging our ideas about what it means to be human in powerful and often disturbing ways. Before we rush to conclusions, we would do well to think through these issues carefully.

Email link | Feedback | Contributed by: Margaret Wertheim

Reload Genes and Sin Topic
Genes and Sin


Topic Index
History
The Birth of Modern Cosmology
Galileo
Separation of Science and Religion
Evolution
Vatican Conferences
Creationism
Genetics
Cloning
Cosmology
The Big Bang
Stephen Hawking's God
God and Time
Purpose
A Theory of Everything
A Cosmic Designer?
Technology
Genetic Screening
The Future
Ongoing Dialog
Ecumenical Dialog

Related Topics:
Genetics
Evolution
Physics and Cosmology
History
Ethics
Theology
The Relation of Science & Religion
Purpose and Design
Controversy
Science and Religion in Conflict?
Books on Science and Religion - General
Galileo
Copernicus
Sir Isaac Newton
Charles Darwin
Dolly the Cloned Sheep
Egg Manipulation
Chromosome
DNA Double-Helix
Castel Gandolfo
Pontifical Academy
Kitt Peak Telescope
Galaxies and Nebulae