View by:







Different Understandings of Chance

The word ‘chance’The subject of a major study from David Bartholomew, God and Chance (London: SCM Press, 1984).is generally used in one of three ways:

  1. in respect of an event such as the tossing of a coin. As Peacocke says, ‘had we sufficient knowledge of the exact values of all the relevant parameters, the laws of mechanics would in fact enable us to say in any particular toss which way the coin would fall.’Peacocke, A, Creation and the World of Science (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1979) p90. Whether we could ever possess such knowledge of a system is highly doubtful.Thus to call such outcomes chance is to confess to the incompleteness of our knowledge of the relevant causative factors, it is not to deny that those factors exist or that they are sufficient to account for the event.

  2. in respect of combinations of events which seem to come from two different causal chains. Peacocke again: ‘Suppose that when you leave the building in which you are reading these pages, as you step on to the pavement you are struck on the head by a hammer dropped by a man repairing the roof... the two trains of events... are each within themselves explicable as causal chains. Yet there is no connection between those causal chains except their point of intersection.’Peacocke, 1979, 90-91

If Laplace were right, and the whole course of the universe theoretically predictable (see determinism, indeterminism and their implications), then of course this hammer-blow would also be predictable. This second meaning of chance would again be an expression of our ignorance.

  1. as a non-technical way of describing the outcomes of events governed by quantum theory. Quantum mechanics, as usually understood, implies that these outcomes are not determinate until they occur - they can only be expressed in terms of probabilities. Not only is our knowledge of systems limited by the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, but there is an inalienable indeterminacy about the events themselves (see Shaking the Foundations: the implications of quantum theory). Polkinghorne has argued that there is indeterminacy also in large-scale chaotic systems.Polkinghorne, 1989, 28-30 - see also Peacocke and Polkinghorne compared.

Meaning ii) has an enormous effect on how the world actually develops - most strikingly in the field of biological evolution. Darwin’s evolutionary schemepostulates that the environment, viewed as an independently changing entity, is at every moment selecting which variants (arising by a largely separate causal chain) will survive and prosper. Contemporary thinking would recognise the situation as much more complex than that: the environment is itself being shaped by the activities of species as they evolve (this is strikingly illustrated by the Gaia HypothesisGod, Humanity and the Cosmos, pp226-29). But the point still has force - most dramatically in respect of the great extinctions. The trajectory of the massive object that collided with the Yucatan Peninsula 60 million years ago clearly belonged to a different causal chain from the one that had given rise to dinosaurs vulnerable to the extreme conditions resulting from the collision. So the course of evolution is highly unpredictable, much influenced by this sort of chance.

But it is meaning iii) of ‘chance’ which offers the ontological indeterminacy, the openness to possible influence from outside the structure of physical law, that has been of such interest to theologians. It seems to offer a possibility other than God banished, before or behindsee God of the gaps.: that is, the possibility of a God who is ‘before’ in the sense of being the initial cause of everything, ‘behind’ in the sense of sustaining the laws and regularities God has established, but also a God working through the openness and indeterminacy of the natural order.

The debate about divine action has to be taken as a whole - any Christian-theological account of God’s activity must include reference to creation and to eschatological redemption - but there is a specific sub-debate, much aired in recent years, on the possibility of God’s particular action in situations in the present. Clayton makes the important point that any such particular action must be congruent with God’s action in universal history as a whole.Clayton, P, God and Contemporary Science [Edinburgh: Edinburgh Academic Press, 1997] p177.We cannot postulate a God faithful in upholding the regularities of the cosmos, but capricious in particular providential action.

Email link | Feedback | Contributed by: Dr. Christopher Southgate
Source: God, Humanity and the Cosmos  (T&T Clark, 1999)

Topic Sets Available

AAAS Report on Stem-Cells

AstroTheology: Religious Reflections on Extraterrestrial Life Forms

Agency: Human, Robotic and Divine
Becoming Human: Brain, Mind, Emergence
Big Bang Cosmology and Theology (GHC)
Cosmic Questions CD-ROM Preview...
Cosmic Questions Interviews

Cosmos and Creator
Creativity, Spirituality and Computing Technologies
CTNS Content Home
Darwin: A Friend to Religion?
Demystifying Information Technology
Divine Action (GHC)
Dreams and Dreaming: Neuroscientific and Religious Visions'
E. Coli at the No Free Lunchroom
Engaging Extra-Terrestrial Intelligence: An Adventure in Astro-Ethics
Evangelical Atheism: a response to Richard Dawkins
Ecology and Christian Theology
Evolution: What Should We Teach Our Children in Our Schools?
Evolution and Providence
Evolution and Creation Survey
Evolution and Theology (GHC)
Evolution, Creation, and Semiotics

The Expelled Controversy
Faith and Reason: An Introduction
Faith in the Future: Religion, Aging, and Healthcare in the 21st Century

Francisco Ayala on Evolution

From Christian Passions to Scientific Emotions
Genetic Engineering and Food

Genetics and Ethics
Genetic Technologies - the Radical Revision of Human Existence and the Natural World

Genomics, Nanotechnology and Robotics
Getting Mind out of Meat
God and Creation: Jewish, Christian, and Muslim Perspectives on Big Bang Cosmology
God, Humanity and the Cosmos: A Textbook in Science and Religion
God the Spirit - and Natural Science
Historical Examples of the Science and Religion Debate (GHC)
History of Creationism
Intelligent Design Coming Clean

Issues for the Millennium: Cloning and Genetic Technologies
Jean Vanier of L'Arche
Nano-Technology and Nano-ethics
Natural Science and Christian Theology - A Select Bibliography
Neuroscience and the Soul
Outlines of the Science and Religion Debate (GHC)

Perspectives on Evolution

Physics and Theology
Quantum Mechanics and Theology (GHC)
Questions that Shape Our Future
Reductionism (GHC)
Reintroducing Teleology Into Science
Science and Suffering

Scientific Perspectives on Divine Action (CTNS/Vatican Series)

Space Exploration and Positive Stewardship

Stem-Cell Debate: Ethical Questions
Stem-Cell Ethics: A Theological Brief

Stem-Cell Questions
Theistic Evolution: A Christian Alternative to Atheism, Creationism, and Intelligent Design...
Theology and Science: Current Issues and Future Directions
Unscientific America: How science illiteracy threatens our future
Will ET End Religion?

Current Stats: topics: >2600, links: >300,000, video: 200 hours.