HOME

 

 

    NEWS

INTERVIEWS

RESOURCES

ABOUT

View by:

 SUBJECT

 THEME

QUESTION

  TERM

 PERSON

   EVENT

Barbour’s Typology

CONFLICT
because of a performed commitment to

Scientific Materialism

Biblical Literalism

INDEPENDENCE
because of a performed commitment to

Contrasting Methods

Presuppositions and Limit Questions

Differing Languages of Discourse

DIALOGUE
possible about

Methodological Parallels

Natural Theology

Nature Centered Spirituality

INTEGRATION
can take the form of

A Theology of Nature

A Systematic Synthesis

Ian Barbour’s most recent typology of the possible relationships between science and religion.This is a slight revision of the scheme in Barbour’s 1990 Gifford Lectures, and is thoroughly discussed in his Religion and Science (London: SCM, 1998) Ch.4.

Refer to natural theology vs theology of nature to find out what Barbour means by these terms.

Barbour’s scheme at least maps out the territory, but in practice students often experience a lot of difficulty in applying his categories with any precision, or aligning themselves wholeheartedly with any particular one. For a series of articles on Barbour and his Gifford Lectures see the journal Zygon, Volume 31, Issue 1, 1996.

A related scheme is that of John Haught, who in his ingenious book Science and Religion: from Conflict to ConversationMahwah, NJ: Paulist Press, 1995(1995), addresses a series of key issues from the standpoints of conflict, contrast, contact and confirmation. This is a more helpful approach than Barbour’s because the categories are not simply mapped out in the abstract, but applied to particular questions.

See also critical realism in science and religion and consonances between science and religion.

Email link | Feedback | Contributed by: Dr. Christopher Southgate
Source: God, Humanity and the Cosmos  (T&T Clark, 1999)

Outlines of the Debate

Index - God, Humanity and the Cosmos, 1999 T&T Clark

Barbour’s Typology

Related Book Topics:

Science and Religion - Conflict or Dialogue?
The ‘Conflict’ or ‘Warfare’ Hypothesis
The Words ‘Science’ and ‘Theology’ in Popular Usage
Possibilities for Dialogue
Different Sciences - Different Relationships
A ‘Special Relationship’?
The Metaphor of the Maps
The Metaphor of the Maps and Understanding the Mind
Key Figures and Developments in the Science-Religion Debate
Typologies Relating Science and Religion
Natural Theology vs Theology of Nature
Peters’ Typology
Drees’ Typology
Religion as Evolutionary Phenomenon
A Critique of Willem B Drees’ Typology
Critical Realism in Science and Religion
Judging the Fit Between Data and Reality
Alternatives to a Realist Position
Applying Critical Realism to Theology
The Ongoing Debate on Critical Realism and Theology
The Role of Model and Metaphor
Model and Metaphor Compared
Consonances Between Science and Religion
Greek Philosophy and the Rise of Western Science
Religion and the Rise of Science

Source:

Dr. Christopher Southgate, Mr Michael Poole, and Mr Paul D. Murray in God, Humanity and the Cosmos.Published by T&T Clark.

See also:

Galileo
Saint Augustine
Sir Isaac Newton
Charles Darwin
The Relation of Science & Religion
History
Controversy
Opinions
Books on Science and Religion - General