HOME

 

 

    NEWS

INTERVIEWS

RESOURCES

ABOUT

View by:

 SUBJECT

 THEME

QUESTION

  TERM

 PERSON

   EVENT

Drees’ Typology

One of the most important analyses of the relation between science and religion is that of Willem B. Drees in Religion, Science and NaturalismCambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996 (1996). Drees stresses two points which have received too little attention in the science-religion debate:

a) That religion contains a number of elements other than the cognitive-propositional.The effort to express in conceptual and analysable terms understandings of the nature of realityIn particular much of the content of religion rests on religious experienceSee God, Humanity and the Cosmos pp185-93and tradition. So Drees proposes a much wider scheme of ‘areas of discussion concerning the relationship of religion and science.’

CHALLENGE POSED BY SCIENCE

CHARACTER OF RELIGION

1. Cognitive

2. Experience

3. Tradition

(a) New knowledge

(1a) Content:
i: Conflicts
ii: Separation
iii: Partial adoption
iv: Integration

(2a) Opportunities for experiential religion? Religious experience and the brain

(3a) Religions traditions as products of evolution

(b) New views of knowledge

(1b) Philosophy of science and opportunities for theology

(2b) Philosophical defenses of religious experiences as data

(3b) Criticism and development of religions as ‘language games’

(c) Appreciation of the world

(1c) A new covenant between humans and the universe?

(2c) Ambivalence of the world and implications for the concept of God

(3c) A basis for hope? Or religions as local traditions without universal claim?

Willem B Drees’ categories of effects on different aspects of religion posed by science (Drees, 1996, 45).

This broadens the debate helpfully, and shows that the categories that have received most attention, Drees’ ‘1a. Content,’ form only one aspect of a complex matrix. These categories concern science’s propositional claims and the way they impinge upon the cognitive claims developed by theologies. Drees shows that these interactions do not exhaust the content of science’s interaction with religions, or the challenges science poses to them.

See however a critique of Willem B Drees’ typology.

b) Drees also recognises clearly that religion is itself a phenomenon in the evolution of human culture. As such it is an object of scientific study. It is less evident, though equally important, to note that the activities of scientific communities are properly the subject of theological and ethical critique. What values do the communities actually evince? Are they committed to disinterested enquiry, or merely to a self-perpetuating search for funding? Does their source of funding constrain what results they can obtain [as may be the case with those epidemiologists employed by the tobacco industry, or those climatologists employed by oil companies]?See God, Humanity and the Cosmos pp45-47 and Ch.11

For further thoughts, see religion as evolutionary phenomenon.

Also see critical realism in science and religion and consonances between science and religion.

Email link | Feedback | Contributed by: Dr. Christopher Southgate
Source: God, Humanity and the Cosmos  (T&T Clark, 1999)

Outlines of the Debate

Index - God, Humanity and the Cosmos, 1999 T&T Clark

Drees’ Typology

Related Book Topics:

Science and Religion - Conflict or Dialogue?
The ‘Conflict’ or ‘Warfare’ Hypothesis
The Words ‘Science’ and ‘Theology’ in Popular Usage
Possibilities for Dialogue
Different Sciences - Different Relationships
A ‘Special Relationship’?
The Metaphor of the Maps
The Metaphor of the Maps and Understanding the Mind
Key Figures and Developments in the Science-Religion Debate
Typologies Relating Science and Religion
Barbour’s Typology
Natural Theology vs Theology of Nature
Peters’ Typology
Religion as Evolutionary Phenomenon
A Critique of Willem B Drees’ Typology
Critical Realism in Science and Religion
Judging the Fit Between Data and Reality
Alternatives to a Realist Position
Applying Critical Realism to Theology
The Ongoing Debate on Critical Realism and Theology
The Role of Model and Metaphor
Model and Metaphor Compared
Consonances Between Science and Religion
Greek Philosophy and the Rise of Western Science
Religion and the Rise of Science

Source:

Dr. Christopher Southgate, Mr Michael Poole, and Mr Paul D. Murray in God, Humanity and the Cosmos.Published by T&T Clark.

See also:

Galileo
Saint Augustine
Sir Isaac Newton
Charles Darwin
The Relation of Science & Religion
History
Controversy
Opinions
Books on Science and Religion - General