HOME

 

 

    NEWS

INTERVIEWS

RESOURCES

ABOUT

View by:

 SUBJECT

 THEME

QUESTION

  TERM

 PERSON

   EVENT

The Science and Religion Project

The founders of Counterbalance believe that valuable insights come when theories from the worlds of science and religion are integrated or held in tension - i.e. counterbalanced . Purely scientific views serve well when we need to explain physical nature around us, but science is mostly inept when we try and apply it to problems of human-nature, or to ethically complex situations. Similarly, a purely traditional religious view provides an ethical framework, but has little to say about new technologies.

Contemporary issues, such those raised by new  developments in genetics demonstrate the problem: Genetic engineering is clearly a high-technology science, but it begs very deep ethical questions - questions that experimental science alone cannot answer for us. Issues such as these show the need for collaboration, (and advancement) in the fields of science-policy, philosophy, ethics and religion.

Fundamentally, we believe that science and religion are often engaged in the pursuit of answers to similar questions: Where did we come from? Where are we going? Is there a reason we are here? How do we (or should we) interact with each other and the environment around us? It is our belief that the more complete answers to these questions may be available only when views from both science and religion are held together to form an integrated whole.

A Word to the Scientific Community

We  believe the full force of objective scientific rigor should be brought to issues. No questions should be taboo. If new evidence is brought to light that would affect previous conclusions, then new theories should emerge.

Scientific inquiry should be, by definition, value-free. However, we also believe that technology - the application of science to real-life situations, including science research - cannot be value-free.

When concepts from the heart of the religious/theological world are discussed, a degree of faith may be required to follow reasoning. However, theological theories need not necessarily require more 'faith' than that required to follow tentative theories from the natural  sciences, where we currently only have probabilistic models or untested/untestable  ideas.

Counterbalance will be religiously scientific. This is our commitment to stay true to scientific principles.

A Word to the Religious Community

We believe that faith plays a central role in most, perhaps all, understanding.  The founders of Counterbalance are unapologetic adherents to Judeo-Christian theology, which we believe to be a compelling and potentially complete explanation of the reality we experience. However, Counterbalance is not an evangelistic organization. To quote the Apostle Paul "[we] are not ashamed of the Gospel," but we are also keen to benefit from insights that may only come when the Christian worldview is reduced to the bare bones that can be appreciated,  critiqued and potentially enhanced by people who find the most genuine expression of spirituality within other religious traditions, or with no religious convictions. It is our opinion that insights and wisdom from the biblical record and contemporary Christian theology can stand as true and valuable on their own, and as such, Counterbalance will not stress the scriptural source of these principles as an argument for their validity.

Counterbalance will be scientifically religious. This is our commitment to stay true to established theological principles, and to good scholarship.

| More

Topic Sets Available

AAAS Report on Stem-Cells

AstroTheology: Religious Reflections on Extraterrestrial Life Forms

Agency: Human, Robotic and Divine
Becoming Human: Brain, Mind, Emergence
Big Bang Cosmology and Theology (GHC)
Cosmic Questions CD-ROM Preview...
Cosmic Questions Interviews

Cosmos and Creator
Creativity, Spirituality and Computing Technologies
CTNS Content Home
Darwin: A Friend to Religion?
Demystifying Information Technology
Divine Action (GHC)
Dreams and Dreaming: Neuroscientific and Religious Visions'
E. Coli at the No Free Lunchroom
Engaging Extra-Terrestrial Intelligence: An Adventure in Astro-Ethics
Evangelical Atheism: a response to Richard Dawkins
Ecology and Christian Theology
Evolution: What Should We Teach Our Children in Our Schools?
Evolution and Providence
Evolution and Creation Survey
Evolution and Theology (GHC)
Evolution, Creation, and Semiotics

The Expelled Controversy
Faith and Reason: An Introduction
Faith in the Future: Religion, Aging, and Healthcare in the 21st Century

Francisco Ayala on Evolution

From Christian Passions to Scientific Emotions
Genetic Engineering and Food

Genetics and Ethics
Genetic Technologies - the Radical Revision of Human Existence and the Natural World

Genomics, Nanotechnology and Robotics
Getting Mind out of Meat
God and Creation: Jewish, Christian, and Muslim Perspectives on Big Bang Cosmology
God, Humanity and the Cosmos: A Textbook in Science and Religion
God the Spirit - and Natural Science
Historical Examples of the Science and Religion Debate (GHC)
History of Creationism
Intelligent Design Coming Clean

Issues for the Millennium: Cloning and Genetic Technologies
Jean Vanier of L'Arche
Nano-Technology and Nano-ethics
Natural Science and Christian Theology - A Select Bibliography
Neuroscience and the Soul
Outlines of the Science and Religion Debate (GHC)

Perspectives on Evolution

Physics and Theology
Quantum Mechanics and Theology (GHC)
Questions that Shape Our Future
Reductionism (GHC)
Science and Suffering

Scientific Perspectives on Divine Action (CTNS/Vatican Series)

Space Exploration and Positive Stewardship

Stem-Cell Debate: Ethical Questions
Stem-Cell Ethics: A Theological Brief

Stem-Cell Questions
Theistic Evolution: A Christian Alternative to Atheism, Creationism, and Intelligent Design...
Theology and Science: Current Issues and Future Directions
Unscientific America: How science illiteracy threatens our future
Will ET End Religion?

Current Stats: topics: >2600, links: >300,000, video: 200 hours.